Harmelin squarely kits the compulsory characteristics out of a low-funding punishment was unimportant to have proportionality aim
Harmelin contended you to definitely a legal couldn’t select whether a phrase try constitutionally disproportionate in place of evaluating it so you’re able to sentences enforced to many other crimes in the same jurisdiction and people implemented for the very same offense various other jurisdictions. within 1004, 111 S.Ct. at the 2706-07. The fresh new Courtroom disagreed, proclaiming that no matter what Solem opinion told you, “they don’t mention a strict three-region decide to try,” and you can “comparative studies contained in this and you may anywhere between jurisdictions is not always highly relevant to proportionality review.” during the 1004-05, 111 S.Ct.